Diamond micropowder, renowned for its exceptional hardness, thermal conductivity, and chemical inertness, is a cornerstone material in precision machining (e.g., grinding semiconductors, polishing ceramics), electronics (wafer processing), and biomedical applications (dental restoration). The uniformity of its particle size directly dictates performance: uniform particles ensure consistent material removal rates, minimize surface defects, and extend tool lifespan. Conversely, broad size distributions lead to uneven polishing, scratch formation, or premature tool wear. Thus, accurate evaluation of uniformity is critical for quality control and application optimization. This article explores key methods to assess diamond micropowder uniformity, their principles, parameters, and practical considerations.
1. Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analysis (LDPSA)
LDPSA is widely used for rapid, non-destructive assessment of particle size distribution. It relies on Mie scattering theory: larger particles scatter laser light at small angles, while smaller particles scatter at larger angles. The instrument collects scattered light at multiple angles to generate a volume-based size distribution curve.

Key uniformity parameters include:
D10/D50/D90: Sizes below which 10%, 50%, or 90% of the sample volume lies.
Span: Calculated as (D90-D10)/D50. A span <1.0 indicates narrow (uniform) distribution; >2.0 denotes broad distribution.
For example, a sample with D10=2μm, D50=5μm, D90=8μm has a span of 1.2 (moderately uniform). Pros: wide measurement range (nm to mm), fast analysis (minutes per sample). Limitations: assumes spherical particles (minor issue for cubic synthetic diamond) and requires dispersion to avoid aggregate interference.
2. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)
DLS is ideal for submicron diamond micropowder. It measures Brownian motion of particles: smaller particles move faster, causing faster intensity fluctuations in scattered light. The hydrodynamic diameter (particle + adsorbed fluid layer) and Polydispersity Index (PDI) are derived.
PDI ranges:
<0.1: Very uniform.
0.1–0.3: Moderate uniformity.
0.3: Broad distribution.
Pros: High sensitivity for nanoscale particles, simple sample prep. Limitations: Only provides average size and PDI (no full distribution), and aggregates inflate PDI. Dispersion (ultrasonication) is critical for accuracy.
3. SEM/TEM: Direct Visualization and Statistical Analysis
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) offer direct particle visualization. SEM captures surface morphology and size; TEM is for nanoscale particles.
To assess uniformity:
Capture images of representative areas.
Use image analysis software to measure 200–300 particles.
Calculate Coefficient of Variation (CV): (Standard Deviation/Mean Size) ×100%. CV <10% = very uniform; 10–20% = moderate; >20% = broad.
Pros: Reveals shape and aggregates. Cons: Time-consuming, sample bias (small area analyzed), and complex prep (sputtering for SEM).
4. Sedimentation and Sieving
These methods are cost-effective for coarser diamond micropowder (>20μm).
Sedimentation: Uses Stokes’ Law (settling velocity ∝ diameter²). X-ray sedimentation generates size distribution curves (D10/D50/D90, span).
Sieving: Stack of sieves with decreasing mesh sizes. Uniformity Coefficient (UC = D60/D10) close to 1 indicates uniformity.
Pros: Reliable for larger particles, low cost. Limitations: Slow (sedimentation), shape-dependent errors, and unsuitable for fine particles.
Critical Factors for Accurate Assessment
Sample Dispersion: Aggregates distort results. Use ultrasonication, dispersants (sodium hexametaphosphate), or agitation to break clusters.
Statistical Significance: Analyze ≥200 particles (microscopy) or sufficient volume (LDPSA/DLS) to avoid bias.
Method Combination: Pair LDPSA (distribution) with SEM (validation) or DLS (fine particles) with TEM for comprehensive data.
Conclusion
Uniformity assessment of diamond micropowder requires selecting the right method based on particle size and application needs. Key parameters (span, PDI, CV, UC) quantify uniformity, while proper dispersion and statistical analysis ensure accuracy. Combining methods yields the most reliable insights, enabling manufacturers to deliver high-performance diamond micropowder for critical industrial uses.
